Math A mystery itself
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
Sunday, 3 February 2013
Armstrong Number
Information: Armstrong number is the sum of cubes of all its digits taken separately.
Example:371, here cube of 3=27, cube of 7 is 343 and cube of 1 is 1.
So 27+343+1=>371.
Other 3 digit Armstrong numbers are:
153,370,371,407.
No two digit Armstrong numbers are available.
And 1 digit Armstrong numbers are 0 andd 1(obviously).
Example:371, here cube of 3=27, cube of 7 is 343 and cube of 1 is 1.
So 27+343+1=>371.
Other 3 digit Armstrong numbers are:
153,370,371,407.
No two digit Armstrong numbers are available.
And 1 digit Armstrong numbers are 0 andd 1(obviously).
Sunday, 27 January 2013
Fermat's Little Theorem
History: On October 18, 1640, Fermat wrote a letter to Bernhard Frenicle de Bessy (1605–
1675), an official at the French mint who was a gifted student of number theory.
In his letter, Fermat communicated the following result(given as Theorem) Fermat did not provide a proof of this result but enclosed a note
promising that he would send along a proof, provided it was not too long. This theorem is known as Fermat's theorem.
Theorem: Let p be a prime and a any integer such that p and a are coprimes.
Then ap−1 ≡ 1 (mod p).
Information:
The first proof of Fermat's little theorem was given by Euler almost a century after Fermat's announcement. Leibniz had given same proof for Fermat's theorem almost 50 years prior to Euler but he didn't receive his share of credit.
=>This theorem can be used for questions like:
Q: Find the remainder when 241936 is divided by 17.
Ans: Here as 24 ≡ 7 (mod 17)
Therefore 241936 ≡ 71936 (mod 17)
But by Fermat's little theorem, 716 ≡ 1 (mod 17).
So,=7168121
71936 =716*121
≡ 1121 ≡ 1 (mod 17)
Thus, remainder is 1.
1675), an official at the French mint who was a gifted student of number theory.
In his letter, Fermat communicated the following result(given as Theorem) Fermat did not provide a proof of this result but enclosed a note
promising that he would send along a proof, provided it was not too long. This theorem is known as Fermat's theorem.
Theorem: Let p be a prime and a any integer such that p and a are coprimes.
Then ap−1 ≡ 1 (mod p).
Information:
The first proof of Fermat's little theorem was given by Euler almost a century after Fermat's announcement. Leibniz had given same proof for Fermat's theorem almost 50 years prior to Euler but he didn't receive his share of credit.
=>This theorem can be used for questions like:
Q: Find the remainder when 241936 is divided by 17.
Ans: Here as 24 ≡ 7 (mod 17)
Therefore 241936 ≡ 71936 (mod 17)
But by Fermat's little theorem, 716 ≡ 1 (mod 17).
So,=7168121
71936 =716*121
≡ 1121 ≡ 1 (mod 17)
Thus, remainder is 1.
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Perfect Numbers
History:
The term was first coined by Pythagoreans. The greeks thought these numbers have mystical good powers and held them to be "good" numbers. Some biblical scholars considered 6 as a perfect number because they believed that the GOD created the world in six days and GOD's work must be perfect.
Definition:
A positive integer is a perfect number if the sum of its proper factors equals n.
First perfect number is 6 then 28 then 496........
Information:
Based on assumptions, Mathematicians of Middle Ages described:
1.There is a perfect number between any two consecutive powers of 10.
2.Perfect numbers end alternatively in 6 and 8.
Now first 6 perfect numbers are:
1.6
2.28
3.496
4.8128
5.33550336
6.8589869056
Which show both assumptions get wrong as there are no prime numbers of length of 5 digits and 5th and 6th prime numbers though end in 6 but not alternatively in 6 and 8.
For perfect numbers,
Euclid gave a formula for perfect numbers:
The term was first coined by Pythagoreans. The greeks thought these numbers have mystical good powers and held them to be "good" numbers. Some biblical scholars considered 6 as a perfect number because they believed that the GOD created the world in six days and GOD's work must be perfect.
Definition:
A positive integer is a perfect number if the sum of its proper factors equals n.
First perfect number is 6 then 28 then 496........
Information:
Based on assumptions, Mathematicians of Middle Ages described:
1.There is a perfect number between any two consecutive powers of 10.
2.Perfect numbers end alternatively in 6 and 8.
Now first 6 perfect numbers are:
1.6
2.28
3.496
4.8128
5.33550336
6.8589869056
Which show both assumptions get wrong as there are no prime numbers of length of 5 digits and 5th and 6th prime numbers though end in 6 but not alternatively in 6 and 8.
For perfect numbers,
Euclid gave a formula for perfect numbers:
" If n is an integer >1 such that 2n -1 is prime, then N=2n-1(2n-1) is a perfect number."
Which gives perfect numbers but there is a fact that no odd perfect numbers are found and there is no proof available stating that odd numbers can not be perfect.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)